体力活动与运动训练对腹主动脉瘤发生风险及临床结局影响的Meta分析
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

中国医科大学附属盛京医院 肿瘤中心,辽宁 沈阳 110004

作者简介:

刘媛媛,中国医科大学附属盛京医院护师,主要从事普通外科疾病运动干预治疗方面的研究。

基金项目:


Effects of physical activity and exercise training on the risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm and clinical outcomes: a Meta-analysis
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的 腹主动脉瘤(AAA)是一种常见且潜在致命的血管疾病,目前除手术治疗外,缺乏明确有效的非药物干预措施。体力活动和运动训练对心血管疾病具有明确获益,但其与AAA发生风险及临床结局之间的关系尚缺乏系统评价。本研究通过Meta分析探讨体力活动与AAA发生风险之间的剂量-反应关系,并评价运动训练对小AAA患者运动适能、疾病进展及围手术期结局的影响。方法 检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Library数据库中有关体力活动或运动训练与AAA关系的前瞻性队列研究及随机对照试验(RCT),检索时限截至2025年12月13日。采用稳健误差Meta回归(REMR)模型分析体力活动水平与AAA发生或筛查发现风险之间的剂量-反应关系;采用随机效应模型合并RCT研究结果,以标准化均数差(SMD)及95%置信区间(CI)评价运动训练对小AAA患者运动适能、生物标志物及围手术期结局的影响。结果 共纳入16项研究。剂量-反应Meta分析纳入4项前瞻性队列研究(94 109例受试者),结果显示体力活动水平与AAA发生或筛查发现风险呈显著线性负相关(非线性检验P=0.582),体力活动每增加20代谢当量-小时/周(MET-h/周),AAA风险降低约14%。6项RCT研究显示,运动训练未增加AAA直径(SMD=-0.03,95% CI=-0.29~0.24,P=0.85),但可显著提高患者3个月(SMD=0.49,95% CI=0.20~0.78,P<0.001)和12个月(SMD=0.71,95% CI=0.47~0.96,P<0.001)的MET水平。运动训练对血压、体质量指数及血清MMP-9水平的影响均无统计学意义。围手术期Meta分析显示,术前运动预康复可显著缩短患者住院时间(SMD=-0.75,95% CI=-1.08~-0.42,P<0.001)。结论 较高水平的日常体力活动与AAA发生风险降低相关。对于小AAA患者,长期规律运动训练具有良好的短期安全性,可显著改善运动适能而不增加瘤体扩张风险;对于拟行手术治疗的AAA患者,术前预康复运动有助于促进术后恢复并缩短住院时间。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a common vascular disorder associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Although physical activity and exercise training have well-established benefits in cardiovascular diseases, their associations with AAA risk and clinical outcomes remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to investigate the dose-response relationship between physical activity and AAA risk and to evaluate the effects of exercise training on exercise capacity, aneurysm progression, and perioperative outcomes in patients with AAA.Methods PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating physical activity or exercise interventions in AAA up to December 13, 2025. Robust error Meta-regression (REMR) was used to assess the dose-response relationship between physical activity and AAA risk. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed for RCTs, and pooled effects were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results Sixteen studies were included. Four prospective cohort studies involving 94 109 participants were eligible for dose-response analysis. Physical activity was linearly associated with a lower risk of AAA occurrence or screening detection (P for non-linearity=0.582), with a 14% reduction in risk for every 20 metabolic equivalent of task (MET)-hour/week increase in physical activity. Six RCTs demonstrated that exercise training did not increase aneurysm diameter (SMD=-0.03, 95% CI=-0.29-0.24, P=0.85), but significantly improved MET levels at both 3 months (SMD=0.49, 95% CI=0.20-0.78, P<0.001) and 12 months (SMD=0.71, 95% CI=0.47-0.96, P<0.001). No significant effects were observed on blood pressure, BMI, or serum MMP-9 levels. In perioperative patients, preoperative exercise-based prehabilitation significantly reduced the length of hospital stay (SMD=-0.75, 95% CI=-1.08- -0.42, P<0.001).Conclusion Higher levels of habitual physical activity are associated with a lower risk of AAA. In patients with small AAA, long-term exercise training appears safe and improves exercise capacity without accelerating aneurysm growth. In patients undergoing AAA repair, preoperative exercise-based prehabilitation may facilitate postoperative recovery and shorten the hospital stay.

    图1 文献筛选流程图Fig.1 Flow chart of the literature screening process
    图2 日常体力活动水平与AAA发生风险剂量-反应Meta分析 A:体力活动与AAA关系的线性回归图;B:体力活动与AAA关系的非线性回归图;C:敏感度分析图;D:漏斗图;E:Egger检验图;F:Begg检验图Fig.2 Dose-response Meta-analysis of physical activity and risk of AAA A: Linear dose-response model; B: Nonlinear dose-response model; C: Sensitivity analysis; D: Funnel plot; E: Eggers test; F: Beggs test
    图3 运动干预对小AAA患者体格指标影响的Meta分析 A:体力活动与AAA直径关系的森林图;B:体力活动与BMI关系的森林图;C:体力活动与SBP关系的森林图;D:体力活动与DBP关系的森林图;E:体力活动与3个月心率关系的森林图;F:体力活动与12个月心率关系的森林图Fig.3 Meta-analysis of the effects of exercise intervention on anthropometric and hemodynamic outcomes in patients with small AAA A: Forest plot of aneurysm diameter; B: Forest plot of BMI; C: Forest plot of SBP; D: Forest plot of DBP; E: Forest plot of heart rate at 3 months; F: Forest plot of heart rate at 12 months
    图4 运动干预对小AAA患者运动适能指标影响的Meta分析 A:体力活动与VO2max数据的森林图;B:体力活动与RER的森林图;C:体力活动与3个月MET数据的森林图;D:体力活动与12个月MET数据的森林图Fig.4 Meta-analysis of the effects of exercise intervention on exercise capacity in patients with small AAA A: Forest plot of VO₂max; B: Forest plot of RER; C: Forest plot of METs at 3 months; D: Forest plot of METs at 12 months
    图5 运动干预对小AAA患者血清生物标志物影响的Meta分析 A:体力活动与TC关系的森林图;B:体力活动与MMP-9关系的森林图;C:体力活动与CRP关系的森林图;D:体力活动与血糖关系的森林图Fig.5 Meta-analysis of the effects of exercise intervention on serum biomarkers in patients with small AAA A: Forest plot of TC; B: Forest plot of MMP-9; C: Forest plot of CRP; D: Forest plot of blood glucose
    图6 运动干预与住院时间关系的森林图Fig.6 Forest plot of the relationship between exercise intervention and hospital length of stay
    表 1 纳入剂量-反应Meta分析的4项研究基本特征Table 1 Characteristics of the four studies included in the dose-response Meta-analysis
    表 3 纳入的6项运动干预对小AAA影响的RCT研究(续)Table 3 Characteristics of the six RCTs evaluating exercise interventions in patients with small AAA (continued)
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘媛媛,张元元,王雅文,刘玉华.体力活动与运动训练对腹主动脉瘤发生风险及临床结局影响的Meta分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2026,35(6):1148-1160.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.260224

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-20
  • 最后修改日期:2026-06-20
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-07-30
谨防不法人员冒充编辑

【温馨提醒】近日,《中国普通外科杂志》编辑部接到作者、编委反映,有不法人员冒充期刊编辑发送编委申请表,收集大家的个人信息。特提醒您,本刊唯一官方邮箱为:pw84327400@vip.126.com,编辑部电话为:0731-84327400,请提高警惕,谨防上当受骗!如有任何疑问,请致电编辑部核实。谢谢!

关闭