基于解剖学视角的经括约肌间切除术中国与国际专家共识比较与解读
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

复旦大学附属华山医院 普通外科,上海 200040

作者简介:

严森,复旦大学附属华山医院博士研究生,主要从事胃肠肿瘤方面的研究。

基金项目:

复旦大学附属华山医院重大疾病前瞻性临床对照研究基金资助项目(2025-YN003)。


Comparison and interpretation of Chinese and international expert consensuses on intersphincteric resection from an anatomical perspective
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    经括约肌间切除术(ISR)是低位直肠癌重要的极限保肛术式。随着ISR相关解剖学研究及微创技术的发展,国内外相继发布专家共识以规范其临床应用。2023年,经括约肌间切除术国际标准化与优化组织(ISOG-ISR)发布改良德尔菲共识,对ISR的解剖学基础、定义、适应证、手术技术及功能学评估进行了规范化阐述;同年,中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组发布《低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术中国专家共识(2023版)》,结合我国临床实践经验,对ISR的解剖结构、围手术期管理及远期结局进行了系统总结。本文基于解剖学视角,对中外ISR专家共识进行比较解读,重点围绕ISR定义、括约肌间隙相关解剖、适应证与禁忌证、手术入路与技术细节、切缘评估及术后功能学结局等方面展开分析,并结合近年来关于括约肌间隙复合体等新解剖学概念的研究进展,探讨不同共识之间差异形成的解剖学基础及其临床意义,以期为ISR的规范化实施与精准化发展提供参考。

    Abstract:

    Intersphincteric resection (ISR) has become an important ultimate sphincter-preserving procedure for low rectal cancer. With advances in anatomical understanding and minimally invasive techniques, several expert consensuses have been published worldwide to standardize ISR. In 2023, the International Standardization and Optimization Group for Intersphincteric Resection (ISOG-ISR) released a modified Delphi consensus that systematically addressed the anatomical basis, definition, indications, surgical techniques, and functional assessment of ISR. In the same year, the Colorectal Surgery Group of the Surgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Association published the Chinese expert consensus on intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer (2023 edition), integrating current evidence with Chinese clinical practice to summarize key anatomical concepts, perioperative management, and long-term outcomes. From an anatomical perspective, this article provides a comparative interpretation of the domestic and international consensuses, focusing on the definition of ISR, intersphincteric anatomy, indications and contraindications, surgical approaches and technical details, margin assessment, and postoperative functional outcomes. In addition, recent advances involving novel concepts such as the intersphincteric complex are discussed to further analyze the anatomical basis underlying the differences between the consensuses and their potential surgical implications. This review aims to provide references for the standardized and precision-oriented development of ISR.

    图1 笔者团队尸体解剖展示肛管左侧壁(黑色三角示CLM纤维穿过EAS)Fig.1 Cadaveric dissection by the authors team showing the left lateral wall of the anal canal (the black triangle indicates CLM fibers passing through the EAS)
    图2 笔者团队绘制的ISR三种入路方式示意图(黑色实线箭头表示经腹切除区域,虚线箭头表示经肛切除区域) A:完全经腹入路ISR手术路线;B:经会阴肛门入路ISR手术路线;C:经腹-会阴肛门联合入路ISR手术路线Fig.2 Schematic illustration of three ISR surgical approaches drawn by the authors team (black solid arrows indicate the transabdominal dissection area, whereas dashed arrows indicate the transanal dissection area) A: Pure transabdominal ISR approach; B: Transperineal transanal ISR approach; C: Combined transabdominal-transanal ISR approach
    表 1 ISR适应证、禁忌证和标本切缘中外专家共识对比Table 1 Comparison of Chinese and ISOG consensuses on indications, surgical strategies, and specimen margins for ISR
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

严森,周易明,项建斌.基于解剖学视角的经括约肌间切除术中国与国际专家共识比较与解读[J].中国普通外科杂志,2026,35(4):674-683.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.260170

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-13
  • 最后修改日期:2026-04-17
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-06-04
通知

编辑部电话线路临时维护,暂无法接通。查稿咨询请发送邮件至:pw84327400@vip.126.com,我们将第一时间回复。

关闭