《美国创伤外科协会-世界急诊外科学会颈部血管损伤诊断与处理指南》解读
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

中国医科大学附属盛京医院 第七普通外科/血管外科,辽宁 沈阳 110020

作者简介:

何赛其,中国医科大学附属盛京医院住院医师,主要从事血管外科疾病诊疗方面的研究。

基金项目:


Interpretation of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cervical vascular injuries
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110020, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    颈部血管损伤(CVI)是创伤外科救治中最具挑战性的急危重症之一,包括钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)和穿透性CVI,两者在筛查、诊断及治疗策略方面存在明显差异。2026年,美国创伤外科协会联合世界急诊外科学会首次发布《颈部血管损伤诊断与处理指南》,系统整合了近年来循证医学证据,对CVI的筛查、影像学诊断、抗血栓治疗、血管腔内介入及穿透性损伤处理策略进行了全面更新。该指南提出,BCVI应由传统的症状驱动诊疗转向高危人群主动筛查,强调抗血栓治疗是绝大多数BCVI患者的基础治疗,仅在特定情况下实施血管腔内介入;对于穿透性颈部损伤,则推荐依据血流动力学状态及临床体征实施“无分区”管理策略,以替代传统的解剖分区处理模式。本文结合指南推荐意见及主要循证依据,对其关键更新内容进行系统解读,并结合我国脑血管疾病负担及临床实践特点,对指南在国内的适用性及未来研究方向进行分析,以期为我国CVI的规范化诊疗提供参考。

    Abstract:

    Cervical vascular injuries (CVIs), including blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) and penetrating cervical vascular injury, are among the most challenging emergencies encountered in trauma surgery because of their distinct diagnostic and therapeutic characteristics. In 2026, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma and the World Society of Emergency Surgery jointly published the first evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of CVIs. The guidelines comprehensively update current recommendations on screening, imaging evaluation, antithrombotic therapy, endovascular intervention, and management of penetrating cervical vascular injuries. Major advances include shifting the management of BCVI from symptom-driven diagnosis to proactive screening of high-risk patients, establishing antithrombotic therapy as the cornerstone of treatment while restricting endovascular intervention to selected indications, and replacing the traditional anatomical zone-based approach for penetrating injuries with a hemodynamic- and clinical sign-based "no-zone" strategy. This review systematically interprets the key recommendations and supporting evidence of the guidelines and discusses their applicability in the Chinese clinical setting in light of the high burden of cerebrovascular disease in China. It is expected to provide a useful reference for the standardized diagnosis and management of cervical vascular injuries in clinical practice.

    图1 CVI管理流程图[27] 1)对于有血管损伤“软体征”的穿透伤,应立即进行影像学检查,而无征象者可观察;2)小面积假性动脉瘤仅需AT即可处理;3)急性夹层卒中后血管内或开放手术干预的获益尚不明确;4)BCVI进展后再行影像学检查的最佳频率或干预指征尚未确立(根据指南原文翻译并重绘)Fig.1 Management algorithm for CVI[27] 1) For penetrating injuries with soft signs of vascular injury, immediate imaging evaluation is recommended, whereas patients without clinical signs may be managed with observation; 2) Small pseudoaneurysms can be managed with antithrombotic therapy alone; 3) The benefit of endovascular or open surgical intervention after acute ischemic stroke secondary to arterial dissection remains uncertain; 4) The optimal frequency of follow-up imaging and the indications for intervention after progression of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) have not yet been established (translated and redrawn from the original guideline)
    表 1 BCVI筛查标准Table 1 Screening criteria for BCVI
    表 2 Denver BCVI分级量表Table 2 Denver grading scale for BCVI
    表 3 CVI的体征分类Table 3 Classification of clinical signs of CVI
    表 4 Table 4
    表 5 Table 5
    图1 CVI管理流程图[27] 1)对于有血管损伤“软体征”的穿透伤,应立即进行影像学检查,而无征象者可观察;2)小面积假性动脉瘤仅需AT即可处理;3)急性夹层卒中后血管内或开放手术干预的获益尚不明确;4)BCVI进展后再行影像学检查的最佳频率或干预指征尚未确立(根据指南原文翻译并重绘)Fig.1 Management algorithm for CVI[27] 1) For penetrating injuries with soft signs of vascular injury, immediate imaging evaluation is recommended, whereas patients without clinical signs may be managed with observation; 2) Small pseudoaneurysms can be managed with antithrombotic therapy alone; 3) The benefit of endovascular or open surgical intervention after acute ischemic stroke secondary to arterial dissection remains uncertain; 4) The optimal frequency of follow-up imaging and the indications for intervention after progression of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) have not yet been established (translated and redrawn from the original guideline)
    表 1 BCVI筛查标准Table 1 Screening criteria for BCVI
    表 2 Denver BCVI分级量表Table 2 Denver grading scale for BCVI
    表 3 CVI的体征分类Table 3 Classification of clinical signs of CVI
    表 4 Table 4
    表 5 Table 5
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

何赛其,潘海洲,刘翀,王恒振,胡海地.《美国创伤外科协会-世界急诊外科学会颈部血管损伤诊断与处理指南》解读[J].中国普通外科杂志,2026,35(6):1111-1119.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.260150

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-18
  • 最后修改日期:2026-06-22
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-07-30
谨防不法人员冒充编辑

【温馨提醒】近日,《中国普通外科杂志》编辑部接到作者、编委反映,有不法人员冒充期刊编辑发送编委申请表,收集大家的个人信息。特提醒您,本刊唯一官方邮箱为:pw84327400@vip.126.com,编辑部电话为:0731-84327400,请提高警惕,谨防上当受骗!如有任何疑问,请致电编辑部核实。谢谢!

关闭