减重代谢手术患者体质量管理临床路径中国专家共识(2026版)
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

基金项目:

江苏省科教能力提升工程基金资助项目(江苏省医学重点学科,ZDXK202222)。


Chinese expert consensus on the clinical pathway of weight management for patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery (2026 edition)
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    减重代谢手术(MBS)是治疗中、重度肥胖症及相关代谢性疾病的重要手段,但术后仍可能出现减重平台期、复发性体质量增加、营养缺乏及心理行为问题,影响长期疗效与生活质量。目前国内虽已发布减重平台期管理及术后随访相关专家共识,但尚缺乏覆盖术前评估、围手术期管理及术后长期随访全过程的体质量管理临床路径。本共识由中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖代谢外科综合管理与护理专家工作组组织制定,在系统检索国内外相关指南、共识及循证医学证据基础上,经两轮专家函询和专家论证形成推荐意见,围绕体质量管理的定义与目标、术前评估与强化管理、术后阶段性管理、术后复发性体质量增加的识别与管理、多学科协作与长期随访体系以及患者教育与自我管理六个方面提出推荐意见,构建覆盖“评估-干预-随访-支持”的全周期体质量管理临床路径,旨在为MBS患者的规范化体质量管理提供参考,提高长期减重维持效果及代谢获益,推动我国减重代谢外科体质量管理的标准化发展。

    Abstract:

    Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is a key treatment for moderate-to-severe obesity and its related metabolic diseases. However, patients may still experience weight loss plateaus, recurrent weight gain, nutritional deficiencies, and psychological-behavioral issues after surgery, compromising long-term outcomes and quality of life. Although domestic expert consensuses on weight loss plateau management and postoperative follow-up exist, there remains a lack of a comprehensive clinical pathway covering the entire process from preoperative assessment and perioperative management to long-term follow-up. This consensus was developed by the Expert Working Group on Obesity Metabolic Surgery Comprehensive Management and Nursing Support Group, Chinese College of Surgeons. Based on a systematic review of domestic and international guidelines, consensuses, and evidence-based literature, recommendations were formulated through two rounds of expert consultation and discussion. The consensus addresses six aspects: definition and goals of weight management, preoperative evaluation and intensive management, staged postoperative weight management, identification and management of recurrent weight gain, multidisciplinary collaboration and long-term follow-up system, and patient education and self-management. It establishes a full-cycle clinical pathway covering "assessment-intervention-follow-up-support", aiming to provide a standardized reference for weight management in MBS patients, enhance long-term weight maintenance and metabolic benefits, and promote the standardization of weight management in metabolic and bariatric surgery in China.

    图1 文献筛选流程图Fig.1 Flow chart of literature search and selection process
    图2 MBS体质量管理临床路径图 注:胃食管反流病问卷(Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire,GerdQ);体力活动问卷短卷(International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form,IPAQ-SF);总体质量减少百分比(percentage of total weight loss,%TWL)Fig.2 Clinical nursing pathways for weight management in patients undergoing MBS Note: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GerdQ); International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF); Percentage of total weight loss (%TWL)
    Fig.
    表 1 证据质量等级Table 1 Classification of quality of evidence
    表 2 证据质量分级标准Table 2 Criteria for grading evidence quality
    表 3 推荐强度分级Table 3 Grading of recommendation strength
    表 4 Table 4
    表 5 Table 5
    表 6 Table 6
    表 7 Table 7
    表 8 Table 8
    图1 文献筛选流程图Fig.1 Flow chart of literature search and selection process
    图2 MBS体质量管理临床路径图 注:胃食管反流病问卷(Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire,GerdQ);体力活动问卷短卷(International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form,IPAQ-SF);总体质量减少百分比(percentage of total weight loss,%TWL)Fig.2 Clinical nursing pathways for weight management in patients undergoing MBS Note: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GerdQ); International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF); Percentage of total weight loss (%TWL)
    Fig.
    表 1 证据质量等级Table 1 Classification of quality of evidence
    表 2 证据质量分级标准Table 2 Criteria for grading evidence quality
    表 3 推荐强度分级Table 3 Grading of recommendation strength
    表 4 Table 4
    表 5 Table 5
    表 6 Table 6
    表 7 Table 7
    表 8 Table 8
    图1 文献筛选流程图Fig.1 Flow chart of literature search and selection process
    图2 MBS体质量管理临床路径图 注:胃食管反流病问卷(Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire,GerdQ);体力活动问卷短卷(International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form,IPAQ-SF);总体质量减少百分比(percentage of total weight loss,%TWL)Fig.2 Clinical nursing pathways for weight management in patients undergoing MBS Note: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GerdQ); International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF); Percentage of total weight loss (%TWL)
    Fig.
    表 1 证据质量等级Table 1 Classification of quality of evidence
    表 2 证据质量分级标准Table 2 Criteria for grading evidence quality
    表 3 推荐强度分级Table 3 Grading of recommendation strength
    表 4 Table 4
    表 5 Table 5
    表 6 Table 6
    表 7 Table 7
    表 8 Table 8
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖代谢外科综合管理与护理专家工作组.减重代谢手术患者体质量管理临床路径中国专家共识(2026版)[J].中国普通外科杂志,2026,35(5):855-872.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.260051

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-26
  • 最后修改日期:2026-04-13
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-07-02
通知

编辑部电话线路临时维护,暂无法接通。查稿咨询请发送邮件至:pw84327400@vip.126.com,我们将第一时间回复。

关闭