肝移植围手术期皮肤葡萄球菌属变化与终末期肝病患者瘙痒症状的相关性研究
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

1.中南大学湘雅三医院,器官移植中心,湖南 长沙 410013;2.中南大学湘雅三医院,国家卫生健康委员会移植医学转化研究重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410013;3.中南大学湘雅三医院,烧伤整形外科,湖南 长沙 410013;4.湖南省传染病临床研究中心,湖南 长沙 410013

作者简介:

汪天胤,中南大学湘雅三医院经治医师,主要从事肝脏疾病方面的研究

基金项目:


Perioperative skin Staphylococcus dynamics and their association with pruritus in end-stage liver disease patients undergoing liver transplantation
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Transplantation Center, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China;2.Key Laboratory of Translational Research in Transplantation Medicine of National Health Commission, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China;3.Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China;4.Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases in Hunan Province, Changsha 410013, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的 终末期肝病(ESLD)患者常伴有顽固性皮肤瘙痒,严重影响生活质量。尽管瘙痒缓解常被归因于肝移植后胆红素水平的恢复,但皮肤菌群在瘙痒发生中的作用尚未明确。本研究旨在探讨ESLD患者肝移植围手术期间皮肤微生态的动态变化及其与瘙痒症状的相关性。方法 纳入2022—2023年中南大学湘雅三医院器官移植中心15例ESLD患者,分别于肝移植术前、术后第7天及第30天采集小腿前区皮肤拭子;同时采集15名健康对照者同部位皮肤样本,采用16S rRNA测序分析菌群构成。同期评估瘙痒视觉模拟评分(VAS),并检测相关血清学指标,分析菌群变化与瘙痒程度及肝功能之间的相关性。结果 ESLD患者皮肤菌群β多样性显著异常,葡萄球菌属相对丰度显著升高(LDA>4),并与瘙痒VAS评分高度正相关(r=0.93,Padj=3.08×10?1?)。术后第7天患者菌群α多样性下降、葡萄球菌属短暂激增,至第30天随瘙痒缓解逐步恢复至接近健康人水平。进一步分析显示,葡萄球菌属丰度与丙氨酸氨基转移酶、天门冬氨酸转移酶、总胆红素、直接胆红素、总胆汁酸、国际标准化比值呈正相关,与白蛋白呈负相关(均Padj<0.05),且其丰度在中重度瘙痒患者(VAS评分>5)中显著升高。结论 ESLD患者在肝移植围手术期皮肤微生态明显紊乱,其中葡萄球菌属的异常增殖可能参与瘙痒的发生与加重。调控皮肤菌群,尤其是针对葡萄球菌属的干预,可能为改善ESLD患者瘙痒症状提供新策略。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) frequently experience persistent pruritus, which significantly impairs their quality of life. Although relief of pruritus after liver transplantation is often attributed to the normalization of bilirubin levels, the role of skin microbiota in developing pruritus remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the dynamic changes in skin microbiota during the perioperative period of liver transplantation in ESLD patients and to explore their association with pruritic symptoms.Methods Fifteen ESLD patients treated in the Third Xiangya Hospital between 2022 and 2023 were enrolled and skin swabs were collected from the anterior tibial region at three time points: before liver transplantation and on postoperative days 7 and 30. Skin samples from 15 age-matched healthy controls were collected at the same anatomical site. Microbial composition was analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing. Meanwhile, pruritus severity was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and multiple serological indicators were measured to evaluate correlations between microbiota changes, pruritus severity, and liver function parameters.Results Compared with healthy controls, ESLD patients exhibited significantly altered β-diversity in skin microbiota and an increased relative abundance of Staphylococcus (LDA>4), which was strongly correlated with VAS scores for pruritus (r=0.93, Padj=3.08×10?1?). On postoperative day 7, α-diversity decreased, and Staphylococcus abundance peaked, then gradually normalized by day 30 as pruritus improved. Further analysis revealed that Staphylococcus abundance was positively correlated with alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, total bile acids, and international normalized ratio, and negatively correlated with albumin (all Padj<0.05). Notably, Staphylococcus levels were significantly higher in patients with moderate to severe pruritus (VAS score>5).Conclusion ESLD patients demonstrate marked dysbiosis of the skin microbiota during the perioperative period of liver transplantation, characterized by an abnormal proliferation of Staphylococcus, which may contribute to the development and exacerbation of pruritus. Targeting the skin microbiome, particularly interventions against Staphylococcus, may offer a novel therapeutic strategy for alleviating pruritus in ESLD patients.

    图1 患者纳入和排除流程图Fig.1 Flowchart of patient inclusion and exclusion
    图2 HC组与ESLD组皮肤微生物群的组成特征 A:α多样性指标(Padj>0.05);B:两组ASV的韦恩图;C:每例样本ASV数目比较;D:两组门和属水平的前20个菌群的相对丰度组成Fig.2 Composition characteristics of the skin microbiota in the HC and ESLD groups A: α-diversity indices (Padj>0.05); B: Venn diagram of ASVs shared between the two groups; C: Comparison of ASV counts per sample; D: Relative abundance of the top 20 taxa at the phylum and genus levels in both groups
    图3 HC组与ESLD组皮肤微生物群的结构差异 A:基于Bray-Curtis距离的PCoA [每个点代表1个样本;点的大小与该样本观测到的ASV数量成比例,ESLD组为蓝色,HC组为绿色;椭圆表示组内95% CI;PERMANOVA(Adonis检验)显示两组整体分布显著分离(R²=0.054 7,P=0.003 1);坐标轴两侧的箱线图展示PCo1和PCo2得分的分布];B:LEfSe分析(LDA得分>4,P<0.05)鉴定两组间丰度差异显著的菌群[橙色条表示在HC组中富集的分类单元,深青色条表示在ESLD患者中富集的分类单元;分类等级通过前缀表示:p_(门)、c_(纲)、o_(目)、f_(科)和g_(属)]Fig.3 Structural differences in the skin microbiota between the HC and ESLD groups A: PCoA based on Bray-Curtis distances [Each point represents one sample; point size is proportional to the observed ASV count. Samples from the ESLD group are shown in blue, and those from the HC group in green. Ellipses indicate the 95% CIs within each group. PERMANOVA (Adonis test) revealed a significant overall separation between groups (R2=0.054 7, P=0.003 1). Box plots adjacent to the axes show the distributions of PCo1 and PCo2 scores]; B: LEfSe analysis (LDA score>4, P<0.05) identified taxa with significantly different abundances between the two groups [Orange bars indicate taxa enriched in healthy controls, while dark teal bars indicate taxa enriched in ESLD patients. Taxonomic ranks are denoted by prefixes: p_ (phylum), c_ (class), o_ (order), f_ (family), and g_ (genus)]
    图4 各组皮肤微生物群的组成特征 A:α多样性指标;B:各组所共有的ASV的韦恩图;C:每例样本ASV数目比较;D:各门和属水平的前20个菌群的相对丰度组成Fig.4 Composition characteristics of the skin microbiota across all groups A: α-diversity indices; B: Venn diagram of shared ASVs among the groups; C: Comparison of ASV counts per sample in each group; D: Relative abundance of the top 20 taxa at the phylum and genus levels in each group
    图5 各组皮肤微生物群的结构差异 A:基于Bray-Curtis距离的PCoA [每个点代表1个样本;点大小与观测到的ASV数量成比例;HC组为绿色,ESLD组为蓝色,LTR_D7组为橙色,LTR_D30组为深青色;椭圆表示各组95% CI;PERMANOVA(Adonis检验)显示组间整体分布显著分离(R²=0.084 7,P=0.000 2);坐标轴两侧的箱线图展示PCo1和PCo2得分的分布];B:LEfSe分析(LDA得分>4,P<0.05)鉴定了LTR_D7组(橙色)与LTR_D30组(深青色)之间丰度差异显著的分类单元[分类等级通过前缀表示:p_(门)、c_(纲)、o_(目)、f_(科)、g_(属)]Fig.5 Structural differences in the skin microbiota across groups A: PCoA based on Bray-Curtis distances [Each point represents one sample; point size is proportional to the observed ASV count. Samples are color-coded by group: green for HC, blue for ESLD, orange for LTR_D7, and dark teal for LTR_D30. Ellipses indicate the 95% confidence intervals within each group. PERMANOVA (Adonis test) revealed a significant overall separation among groups (R2=0.084 7, P=0.000 2). Box plots adjacent to the axes display the distributions of PCo1 and PCo2 scores]; B: LEfSe analysis (LDA score>4, P<0.05) identified taxa with significantly different relative abundances between the LTR_D7 group (orange) and the LTR_D30 group (dark teal) [Taxonomic ranks are denoted by prefixes: p_(phylum), c_(class), o_(order), f_(family), and g_(genus)]
    图6 差异皮肤菌群和瘙痒评分的变化趋势 A:韦恩图显示差异菌群的重叠情况;B:葡萄球菌属在各组中的相对丰度;C:各ESLD患者不同时间点葡萄球菌属相对丰度配对折线图;D:各ESLD患者不同时间点的瘙痒VAS评分配对折线图Fig.6 Trends in differential skin microbiota and pruritus scores A: Venn diagram showing the overlap of differential taxa; B: Relative abundance of Staphylococcus across different groups; C: Paired line plot of Staphylococcus relative abundance in individual ESLD patients at different time points; D: Paired line plot of pruritus VAS scores in individual ESLD patients at different time points
    图7 差异皮肤菌群与瘙痒评分的相关性分析(每个点代表1例受试者,红色实线为线性回归拟合曲线,阴影区域表示95% CI)Fig.7 Correlation analysis between differential skin microbiota and pruritus scores (Each dot represents one subject; the red solid line indicates the linear regression fit, and the shaded area represents the 95% CI)
    图8 不同瘙痒程度患者皮肤葡萄球菌属相对丰度比较Fig.8 Comparison of the relative abundance of Staphylococcus in patients with different pruritus severities
    图9 包含ESLD组、LTR_D7组和LTR_D30组的皮肤葡萄球菌属相对丰度与临床实验室指标的相关性分析(每个点代表1例受试者,红色实线为线性回归拟合曲线,浅红色阴影为95% CI)Fig.9 Correlation analysis between the relative abundance of skin Staphylococcus and clinical laboratory parameters across the ESLD, LTR_D7, and LTR_D30 groups (Each dot represents one subject; the red solid line indicates the linear regression fit, and the light red shaded area represents the 95% CI)
    图10 包含ESLD组和LTR_D30组的皮肤葡萄球菌属相对丰度与临床实验室指标的相关性分析(每个点代表1例受试者,红色实线为线性回归拟合曲线,浅红色阴影为95% CI)Fig.10 Correlation analysis between the relative abundance of skin Staphylococcus and clinical laboratory parameters across the ESLD and LTR_D30 groups (Each dot represents one subject; the red solid line indicates the linear regression fit, and the light red shaded area represents the 95% CI)
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

汪天胤,朱毅,李珮婷,向旭昱,明英姿.肝移植围手术期皮肤葡萄球菌属变化与终末期肝病患者瘙痒症状的相关性研究[J].中国普通外科杂志,2025,34(5):996-1011.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.250177

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-26
  • 最后修改日期:2025-05-22
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-07-01